Hoechst v state of bihar
NettetThe State of Bihar & others. Messrs Hoechst Pharmaceuticals Limited and Messrs Glaxo Laboratories (India) Limited are companies incorporated under the Companies Act , … NettetIn Hoechst pharmaceuticals ltd. v. state of Bihar, the state made a law under entry 54, list II and center made a law under entry 33 of list III. The laws overlap. Will repugnancy …
Hoechst v state of bihar
Did you know?
Nettet18. jun. 2024 · Issues discussed by the Court. In Rudul Shah’s judgment, the court satisfactorily answered the three issues raised in the case. The first issue was related to the compensatory powers under Article 32. The court said that in a democratic nation, such as India, the state must work for the betterment of its people. Nettet24. apr. 2014 · Paragraph 19 interdicts that every manufacturer or importer of a formulation intended for sale shall furnish to the dealers, State Drug Controllers and-the Government, a price list showing the price at which the formulation …
Nettet5. aug. 2024 · State of Uttar Pradesh, (1959), the Allahabad High Court declared Section 124A to be ultra vires of the Constitution as it imposes a restriction on Article 19 (1) (a) and it is not in the interest of the general public. Case analysis of Kedar Nath v. State of Bihar, 1962. The Constitutional Bench of the Supreme Court in Kedar Nath Singh v. NettetThe impugned provision levies a surcharge on sales or purchase tax payable by every dealer whose gross turnover during a year exceeds Rs. 5,00,000. The surcharge is not …
Nettet6. mai 1983 · Hoechst Pharmaceuticals Ltd. / Jamuna Flour and Oil Mills / Pharma Associates v. State of Bihar [Citation -1983-LL-0506-3 ... Citation: 1983-LL-0506-3: Appellant Name: Hoechst Pharmaceuticals Ltd. / Jamuna Flour and Oil Mills / Pharma Associates: Respondent Name: State of Bihar: Court: SUPREME COURT: Relevant … Nettet24. apr. 2014 · Hoechst Pharmaceuticals Ltd. & Anr V. State Of Bihar & Ors (5) April 24, 2014by Lakhwinder Shaw Share this on WhatsApp Previous Part Next Part > (4) …
http://notesforfree.com/2024/12/20/rule-of-repugnancy-indian-constitution/
Nettet21. des. 2024 · The case of Hoechst Pharma ltd. v. State of Bihar discusses the effect of Clause (2) of Article 254. It was observed that the assent of the President for a state … erica kalnayNettet- Constitution 1962 And Presidents Orders... The Trinidad and Tobago (Constitution) Order in Council, 1962 PDF Download telekom 3 liga magentaNettetCouncil 13. Dr. Pradeep Jain v. Union of India 14. Ex-Capt. Harish Uppal v. Union of India 15. Forum, Prevention of Envn. and Sound Pollution v. Union of India 4 50 Leading Cases of Supreme Court of India www.discountbookstore.in 16. Gaurav Jain v. Union of India 17. Hoechst Pharmaceuticals Ltd. v. State of Bihar 18. I.C. Golak Nath v . State ... telekom 4g nelimitatNettetHoechst Pharmaceuticals Ltd. And Ors. Vs. State Of Bihar And Ors. Date : 1983-05-06 Court : Supreme Court of India Case Number : Civil Appeals Nos.2567, 2818-20, 2648 ... telekom a53 samsungNettetHence, Art. 254(1) can not apply unless both the Union and the State laws relate to a subject specified in the Con current List, and they occupy the same field. This construction of ours is supported by the observations of Venkatarama Ayyar, J. speaking for the Court in A. S. Krishna's case, supra, while dealing with s. 107(1) of the Government of India … telekom 2 sim karte prepaidNettetState of Bihar and Civil Appeal No. 3277 of 1982 — Messrs Glaxo Laboratories (India) Limited v. State of Bihar. Messrs Hoechst Pharmaceuticals Limited and Messrs Glaxo Laboratories (India) Limited are companies incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 engaged in the manufacture and sale of various medicines and life-saving drugs … telekom 5g jahrestarif testNettetNishi Kant Jha v/s State of Bihar Criminal Appeal No. 190 (N) of 1966 Decided On, 02 December 1968. At, Supreme Court of India By, HON ... Narain Singh v. the state of … telekom abmeldung tod