WebbHad the ramp broken at the day centre, even if the defect were not reasonably discoverable then that would be a simple PUWER claim against the Council along the lines of Stark v Post Office. In the example of the chair in the House of Lords, a claim would stand against the House of Lords under PUWER 1998 under the separate Regulation 3(iii) for non … WebbThe best known example of strict liability is the case of Stark v Post Office in 2000. Mr Stark was working as a postman when part of the front brake mechanism of his bicycle failed, causing an accident in which he was injured. The defect was not ‘discoverable on any routine inspection’ so there was no negligence, but his employers were held
BAILII - England and Wales Cases page 239
Webb11 mars 2008 · 5. HHJ Metcalf concluded that the 1998 Regulations applied in this case. Those regulations impose on an employer a regime of strict liability in respect of "work equipment" and in particular as regards the maintenance of such equipment; see Stark v Post Office [2000] EWCA Civ 64.The judge found that the ramp was "work equipment" … Webb22 sep. 2024 · Stark v Post Office: CA 2 Mar 2000. A component in a postman’s bicycle gave way even though the machine had been sensibly maintained and checked. He … echo full spey
Stark v Post Office [2000] EWCA Civ 64 - CaseMine
WebbStark Post Office. 111 W Main St, Stark, KS 66775. Contact Numbers. Phone: 620-754-3700. TTY: 877-889-2457. Toll-Free: 1-800-Ask-USPS® (275-8777) Retail Hours. Monday … http://files.caunceohara.co.uk/pdf/enterprise_act.pdf WebbAs is almost always the position, the extreme situation reached in the case of Stark v Post Office [2000] CA was referred to by the judge in the context of the changed regime. As the Post Office had taken reasonable precautions in relation to the postman's bike, then if the claim had come to trial after implementation of the changed regime brought into play by … echo full time